<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Haft Law Group</title>
    <subtitle type="text">FindLaw IM Template</subtitle>

    <updated>2026-07-30T05:10:23Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com" />
    <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.5504173802156399" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.5">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1204496/2020/11/cropped-favicon-haft-law-firm-1-32x32.jpg</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Why Your Florida LLC May Not Protect What You Think It Does]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/why-your-florida-llc-may-not-protect-what-you-think-it-does/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47961</id>
            <updated>2026-07-30T05:10:23Z</updated>
            <published>2026-07-30T05:10:23Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Florida business owners and investors routinely hold real estate, investment accounts, and operating companies in a single-member LLC, on the understanding that a personal judgment cannot reach inside the entity. For multi-member LLCs, that understanding is close to right. For single-member LLCs, Florida law says something different. ## What a Charging Order Does A judgment creditor of an LLC member…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/why-your-florida-llc-may-not-protect-what-you-think-it-does/"><![CDATA[Florida business owners and investors routinely hold real estate, investment accounts, and operating companies in a single-member LLC, on the understanding that a personal judgment cannot reach inside the entity. For multi-member LLCs, that understanding is close to right. For single-member LLCs, Florida law says something different.
<h2>## What a Charging Order Does</h2>
A judgment creditor of an LLC member does not simply take the company's assets. The creditor applies for a charging order, which creates a lien on the member's transferable interest and requires the company to pay the creditor any distribution that would otherwise go to the debtor. Â§ 605.0503(1), Fla. Stat.

That remedy is deliberately weak. The creditor waits on distributions rather than seizing anything, with no vote, no management rights, and no power to compel a payout. Section 605.0503(3) makes the charging order the sole and exclusive remedy, subject to two exceptions.
<h2>## *Olmstead* and the Single-Member Exception</h2>
In *Olmstead v. Federal Trade Commission*, 44 So. 3d 76 (Fla. 2010), the Florida Supreme Court took a certified question from the Eleventh Circuit asking whether a court could order judgment debtors to surrender all right, title, and interest in their single-member LLCs. It answered yes, reasoning that the LLC statute then in force, section 608.433(4), contained no language making the charging order the only available remedy.

The facts were unsympathetic. The debtors had operated a credit card scam and the creditor was the FTC. The holding, however, was general.

The Legislature responded the following year by amending section 608.433, and the rule now appears at section 605.0503, enacted as part of the Florida Revised Limited Liability Company Act. What it restored was narrower than most owners assume.
<h2>## The Statute Turns on Member Count</h2>
**Multi-member LLCs.** Foreclosure on a member's interest is not available to a judgment creditor and may not be ordered by a court. Â§ 605.0503(6), Fla. Stat. As to foreclosure, that protection is unqualified.

**Single-member LLCs.** If a judgment creditor establishes that distributions under a charging order will not satisfy the judgment within a reasonable time, the charging order stops being exclusive and the court may order a foreclosure sale of the member's interest. Â§ 605.0503(4). The creditor may make that showing at any point after judgment, including in the same application that requests the charging order.

The consequences of foreclosure are complete. The purchaser acquires the member's entire limited liability company interest rather than the rights of a mere transferee, becomes the member, and the former owner ceases to be one. Â§ 605.0503(5). Ownership of the company, and therefore practical control of everything the company owns, changes hands.
<h2>## Adding a Member Later Is Not a Reliable Cure</h2>
The instinctive fix is to admit a second member. Two problems.

Whether an LLC has one member or several is a question of fact. A creditor confronting a nominal or newly added member will contest it, and the statute gives that fight real stakes, because subsections (4) and (6) turn entirely on the answer.

Beyond that, section 605.0503(7) limits nothing in the law of fraudulent transfers, and preserves alter ego, equitable lien, and constructive trust theories along with the rights of consensual secured creditors. Those limits apply to every Florida LLC, whatever its member count. Restructuring after a claim has surfaced tends to invite all of them at once.
<h2>## The Practical Point</h2>
Single-member LLCs became the default for good reasons. They are simple, inexpensive, and by default disregarded for federal income tax purposes. None of those reasons has anything to do with creditor protection, and Florida law now treats them accordingly.

Anyone holding significant assets in Florida entities should know how many members each one actually has, whether the operating agreements match how the businesses are really run, and whether each entity was built for tax efficiency, administrative convenience, or protection from creditors. Those are three different objectives, and a structure that serves one will often fail at the others.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Equitable Ownership in Florida: When a Seller Conveys Property Already Under Contract]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/equitable-ownership-in-florida-when-a-seller-conveys-property-already-under-contract/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47960</id>
            <updated>2026-07-27T06:43:17Z</updated>
            <published>2026-07-27T06:43:17Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A developer signs a purchase and sale agreement on a specific parcel. Due diligence runs. Before closing, the seller conveys the property to someone else at a better price, and the developer is told the deal is dead and the deposit is on its way back. That conclusion is often wrong. Under Florida law, ownership of that parcel may have…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/equitable-ownership-in-florida-when-a-seller-conveys-property-already-under-contract/"><![CDATA[A developer signs a purchase and sale agreement on a specific parcel. Due diligence runs. Before closing, the seller conveys the property to someone else at a better price, and the developer is told the deal is dead and the deposit is on its way back.

That conclusion is often wrong. Under Florida law, ownership of that parcel may have divided at signing, long before any deed changed hands.
<h2>## Equitable Title Arises at Contract</h2>
Legal title is record ownership. Equitable title is beneficial ownership, meaning the right to the property's value and the right to compel conveyance. Florida has long held that a valid and enforceable contract for the sale of land separates the two. The buyer takes equitable title. The seller keeps naked legal title, held in trust as security for the purchase price.

Arko Enterprises, Inc. v. Wood, 185 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), sets out what the buyer holds. That interest can be sold on execution, mortgaged, or made the subject of a trust. It is an estate of inheritance that descends to heirs. It supports an action for trespass. And it carries the risk of loss, so damage or condemnation occurring after signing generally falls on the buyer. Id. at 737-38.

Two points matter to developers. The interest is a transferable asset, which is why contract assignments carry value. And the doctrine is not automatic, because it turns on what the agreement actually says, and most Florida form contracts modify the common law allocation of risk.
<h2>Whether the Third Party Is Bound Turns on Notice</h2>
A seller who has contracted to sell can still deliver a deed to someone else. The question is what that third party takes. Florida law is direct on the point: successors to legal title take subject to those equitable interests of which they have notice. Kroitzsch v. Steele, 768 So. 2d 514, 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Section 695.01(1), Florida Statutes, protects only a subsequent purchaser who pays valuable consideration and takes without notice. A buyer who fails that test is not a bona fide purchaser and can be compelled to convey.
<h3>Notice takes three forms:</h3>
-Actual notice. The third party knew about the contract. Brokers talk, and emails survive.

-Constructive notice. The contract, or a memorandum of it, was recorded and sits in the chain of title.

-Inquiry notice. Possession that is open, visible, and exclusive obligates a later purchaser to determine what rights the occupant actually holds. Kroitzsch, 768 So. 2d at 517.

Where none of the three applies, the third party generally takes free of the earlier contract, and the original buyer is left pursuing the seller for damages.
<h2>Recording a Lis Pendens Is Not Optional</h2>
Filing suit does not protect the property. Section 48.23(1)(b)1, Florida Statutes, provides that an action for specific performance, or one not founded on a duly recorded instrument, has no effect on title except between the parties to the case unless a notice of lis pendens has been recorded. A buyer who sues without recording leaves the seller free to close with a purchaser who has no notice.

Two mechanics deserve attention. First, the notice has to survive a motion to discharge. Where the pleading does not show the claim is founded on a duly recorded instrument, the court controls the notice as it would an injunction, and the proponent must establish a fair nexus between the apparent legal or equitable ownership of the property and the dispute embodied in the lawsuit. Chiusolo v. Kennedy, 614 So. 2d 491, 492 (Fla. 1993); § 48.23(3), Fla. Stat. Second, the notice expires one year after the action commences unless the pleading discloses that the claim rests on a duly recorded instrument. § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. Everyone else is left seeking a good cause extension on the court's terms.

This is why the right to record a memorandum of the agreement is worth negotiating at signing rather than arguing about later. It is also why sellers resist that term, and why a buyer who records without a viable claim invites exposure of its own.
<h2>The Same Analysis Runs the Other Way</h2>
Developers sit on both sides of this. A seller who signs one contract and then negotiates with a second buyer should understand that the first agreement may already have transferred equitable title, that a recorded lis pendens can encumber the parcel for a year or longer, and that a title insurer is unlikely to write over a pending specific performance claim. The parcel often cannot be financed or sold while the case is litigated.
<h2>When There Was Never a Signed Agreement</h2>
Equitable title can also arise without a contract. Courts impose a constructive trust where a titleholder cannot fairly retain the benefit of the property, on proof of (1) a promise, express or implied, (2) a transfer of the property and reliance on it, (3) a confidential relationship, and (4) unjust enrichment, each shown by clear and convincing evidence. Provence v. Palm Beach Taverns, Inc., 676 So. 2d 1022, 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Chiusolo itself began that way, brought by a claimant who advanced the funds used to buy the property and never received the interest he was promised.

The writing requirements are less of an obstacle than they appear. Section 725.01 requires land sale contracts to be in writing, and section 689.05 requires declarations of trust in land to be signed. But section 689.05 carves out trusts arising by implication or construction of law, which is how constructive and resulting trusts come into being, and an oral agreement to convey can still support specific performance on proof of payment, possession, and valuable permanent improvements made with the seller's consent. Miller v. Murray, 68 So. 2d 594, 596 (Fla. 1953).
<h2>The Practical Lesson</h2>
A signed contract on an identified parcel is not merely a promise to sell. It is an ownership interest capable of binding a later purchaser. It is also an interest that a buyer without notice can defeat, and notice costs far less to create at signing than to litigate afterward.

Negotiate recording rights while the deal is still friendly, document possession and site activity, and treat any sign that a seller considers the parcel still available as a matter of days rather than weeks.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[How Much Can a 501(c)(3) Lobby? A Guide for Florida Nonprofits]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/how-much-can-a-501c3-lobby-a-guide-for-florida-nonprofits/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47959</id>
            <updated>2026-07-22T05:09:23Z</updated>
            <published>2026-07-22T05:09:23Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Many nonprofit leaders assume that a 501(c)(3) charity may not lobby at all. That is a myth. Federal law lets a charity engage in a measured amount of lobbying. What it forbids is letting that activity grow into too large a part of what the organization does. For any Florida charity that wants to advocate for its mission, knowing where…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/how-much-can-a-501c3-lobby-a-guide-for-florida-nonprofits/"><![CDATA[Many nonprofit leaders assume that a 501(c)(3) charity may not lobby at all. That is a myth. Federal law lets a charity engage in a measured amount of lobbying. What it forbids is letting that activity grow into too large a part of what the organization does. For any Florida charity that wants to advocate for its mission, knowing where that line sits is essential to protecting its exemption.

<strong>## Lobbying is limited. Campaign activity is not allowed.</strong>

Two rules are often confused. Lobbying means attempting to influence legislation, and a 501(c)(3) may do some of it. Intervening in a political campaign for or against a candidate for public office is a separate matter and is flatly prohibited. That kind of activity can cost an organization its exemption outright. This post addresses only the first category, lobbying.

<strong>## Two ways to measure "too much"</strong>

The Internal Revenue Code offers two tests.

The default is the "substantial part" test under Section 501(c)(3). A charity loses its exemption if a substantial part of its activities consists of trying to influence legislation. The IRS weighs all the facts and circumstances, including staff and volunteer time and dollars spent. The catch is that "substantial" is never reduced to a percentage, so organizations are left to guess.

The alternative is the expenditure test under Section 501(h). By filing a one-page form (Form 5768), an eligible charity swaps that vague standard for clear dollar limits. Most charities that lobby regularly make this election. Churches and private foundations cannot.

<strong>## The 501(h) dollar limits</strong>

For an electing charity, Section 4911 sets a sliding scale tied to "exempt purpose expenditures," meaning the money the organization spends pursuing its mission:

- 20% of the first $500,000
- 15% of the next $500,000
- 10% of the next $500,000
- 5% of everything above that

For example, a charity that spends $400,000 on its mission may devote up to $80,000 to lobbying. Total lobbying is capped at $1 million per year no matter how large the organization is. A separate limit caps grassroots lobbying, meaning efforts to move the general public to contact legislators, at 25% of the overall lobbying allowance.

<strong>## What does not count as lobbying</strong>

Several activities fall outside the definition entirely. These include sharing the results of nonpartisan analysis or research; giving technical advice to a legislative body that requests it in writing; communicating with your own members about legislation that affects them; and examining broad social or economic problems without urging action on a specific bill. Used carefully, these exceptions leave real room to inform public debate.

<strong>## The cost of crossing the line</strong>

For a charity that has made the 501(h) election, exceeding the annual limit triggers a 25% excise tax on the excess rather than automatic loss of status. Exemption is lost only if lobbying normally runs more than 150% of the limit measured over four years. A charity that never elected faces a harsher path: losing its exemption for substantial lobbying also brings a 5% excise tax on that year's lobbying spending, and the managers who approved it can be taxed personally as well. Private foundations may not lobby at all, and any such spending is a taxable expenditure under Section 4945.

<strong>## Advocate with confidence</strong>

The right approach depends on your budget, your goals, and how central advocacy is to your mission. Before your organization expands its legislative work, or if you are unsure whether a planned activity even counts as lobbying, review the rules with counsel first. Haft Law Group advises Florida nonprofits on tax-exempt compliance and can help you advocate effectively while safeguarding the status you worked hard to earn.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Can you lose your trademark rights by not using your brand?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/can-you-lose-your-trademark-rights-by-not-using-your-brand/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47947</id>
            <updated>2026-07-02T14:04:43Z</updated>
            <published>2026-07-07T14:03:58Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Your business name and logo may become some of your company’s most valuable assets. They help customers recognize your products or services and distinguish your business from competitors. Because of that, you might assume that trademark protection lasts indefinitely after registration. Trademark rights do not depend on registration alone. In the United States, those rights generally depend on continued use…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/07/can-you-lose-your-trademark-rights-by-not-using-your-brand/"><![CDATA[Your business name and logo may become some of your company's most valuable assets. They help customers recognize your products or services and distinguish your business from competitors. Because of that, you might assume that trademark protection lasts indefinitely after registration.

Trademark rights do not depend on registration alone. In the United States, those rights generally depend on continued use of the mark and compliance with certain filing requirements. If you stop using your trademark or fail to maintain your registration, you could lose important rights tied to your brand.
<h2>How can a business lose trademark rights?</h2>
You could lose trademark rights in several situations, including:
<ul>
 	<li>Stopping use of the trademark without plans to resume it</li>
 	<li>Missing required maintenance or renewal filings</li>
 	<li>Allowing similar branding to remain in the marketplace without objection</li>
 	<li>Retiring a business name or logo during a rebranding effort without considering its trademark status</li>
</ul>
Trademark rights generally depend on continued <a href="https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/application-filing-basis#:~:text=meanings%20and%20requirements.-,Use%20in%20commerce,-Use%20in%20commerce" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">use in commerce</a> and compliance with certain registration requirements. If you stop using a trademark and do not intend to use it again, the law may consider the mark abandoned.

Missing maintenance deadlines can also result in cancellation of a federal registration. In some cases, another business may adopt similar branding after trademark rights lapse, which can lead to disputes over who may continue using the name or logo.
<h2>Why can inaction create business problems?</h2>
Losing <a href="/trademark-registration/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-wpel-link="internal">trademark rights</a> can create several business challenges, including:
<ul>
 	<li>Losing the exclusive use of your business name or branding</li>
 	<li>Creating confusion about the source of your products or services</li>
 	<li>Increasing costs associated with rebranding efforts</li>
 	<li>Complicating plans to enter new markets</li>
</ul>
These issues can affect the value of your business and the goodwill associated with your brand. If your company has spent years building recognition around a particular name or logo, losing rights to that branding can create practical and financial challenges.
<h2>Trademark protection requires ongoing attention</h2>
A trademark registration does not preserve your rights forever. Continued use of the mark and compliance with registration requirements play an important role in maintaining those rights.

For many business owners, a trademark represents years of investment in a company's identity and reputation. Because trademark rights can change over time, trademarks remain business assets that require ongoing maintenance rather than one-time filings.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Honorary Degrees and Titles in Florida: What the Law Actually Allows]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/honorary-degrees-and-titles-in-florida-what-the-law-actually-allows/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47948</id>
            <updated>2026-06-29T03:22:15Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-27T12:00:20Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[An honorary doctorate can sound like a harmless honor, a nice title to place after your name or to award a generous supporter. In Florida, though, granting one, or even using one, is governed by surprisingly strict rules. Florida treats an honorary credential like any other degree. Generally, an organization cannot grant degrees, or call itself a “University” or “College,”…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/honorary-degrees-and-titles-in-florida-what-the-law-actually-allows/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: 400;">An honorary doctorate can sound like a harmless honor, a nice title to place after your name or to award a generous supporter. In Florida, though, granting one, or even using one, is governed by surprisingly strict rules.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Florida treats an honorary credential like any other degree. Generally, an organization cannot grant degrees, or call itself a “University” or “College,” without approval from the state’s Commission for Independent Education. It is even a crime to claim a degree or title unless the institution is accredited, governmental, licensed, or religious.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The religious exemption is the main path. A genuine religious institution may operate without state licensure and award religiously titled honorary degrees, such as Doctor of Divinity or Doctor of Ministry, that recipients can lawfully use in Florida. But the exemption is narrow. Programs must prepare people for religious vocations, and titles must read as clearly religious, not as secular doctorates like a Ph.D. or Ed.D.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Marketing matters just as much. Florida’s consumer protection laws disfavor any “pay a fee, receive a title” arrangement that resembles selling degrees. Every certificate and web page should state plainly that the award is honorary recognition, not an earned or accredited degree.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The rules are technical, and getting them wrong carries real consequences. Whether you are considering an organization that grants degrees or honorary titles, or have been offered one, understand the law before you act.</span>

<b>Thinking about forming a nonprofit, an educational entity, or an honorary award program in Florida? Haft Law Group can help you structure it correctly. Call <a href="tel:+15617818984" data-wpel-link="internal">561.781.8984</a> to <a href="/contact/" data-wpel-link="internal">schedule a consultation</a>.</b>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[The Florida Statute of Frauds: Which Contracts Must Be in Writing?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/the-florida-statute-of-frauds-which-contracts-must-be-in-writing/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47945</id>
            <updated>2026-06-16T05:25:34Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-16T05:23:02Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Most agreements in Florida are enforceable whether they are written down or merely spoken—but not all of them. A group of contracts singled out by a centuries-old rule known as the “statute of frauds” must be set out in a signed writing, or a court will refuse to enforce them. Florida codifies its version primarily in Section 725.01 of the…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/the-florida-statute-of-frauds-which-contracts-must-be-in-writing/"><![CDATA[Most agreements in Florida are enforceable whether they are written down or merely spoken—but not all of them. A group of contracts singled out by a centuries-old rule known as the “statute of frauds” must be set out in a signed writing, or a court will refuse to enforce them. Florida codifies its version primarily in Section 725.01 of the Florida Statutes, with a parallel rule for the sale of goods in the Uniform Commercial Code. For anyone buying property or doing business in Florida, knowing which deals fall under the statute can be the difference between a binding agreement and an expensive misunderstanding.

<h2>Real estate contracts must be in writing</h2>
<p>Real estate is the statute’s best-known territory. Under Section 725.01, a contract for the sale of land—or of any interest in land—must be in writing and signed by the party to be charged, meaning the person against whom the agreement is being enforced. The same requirement applies to leases for a term longer than one year. As a practical matter, an oral agreement to buy or sell Florida real estate, or a multi-year lease sealed with nothing more than a handshake, is generally unenforceable, no matter how sincere the parties were when they made it.</p>
<p>Florida courts do recognize a narrow exception for real estate known as “part performance.” Where a buyer has paid part of the purchase price, taken possession of the property, and made valuable, permanent improvements, a court sitting in equity may order the seller to complete the sale even without a signed contract. This exception comes with an important limit: it is available only when the buyer seeks specific performance—an order compelling the sale—and not when the claim is for money damages. Because the doctrine is fact-specific and easily lost, it is no substitute for a written agreement.</p>

<h2>Other contracts the statute covers</h2>
<p>The statute of frauds reaches well beyond real estate. Section 725.01 also requires a signed writing for several other promises: an agreement that by its terms cannot be performed within one year, a promise to pay the debt or answer for the default of another person (such as a guaranty), an agreement made in consideration of marriage, an executor’s or administrator’s promise to pay estate debts out of his or her own funds, and a health care provider’s guarantee of a particular medical result. Separately, Florida’s Uniform Commercial Code (Section 672.201) requires a signed record for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more, subject to its own exceptions for merchant confirmations, specially manufactured goods, admissions made in court, and goods that have already been paid for or accepted.</p>

<h2>The exceptions are narrow</h2>
<p>It is tempting to assume that having relied on a broken oral promise will be enough to win in court, but Florida law is stricter than many people expect. The one-year provision, for instance, applies only when performance is impossible within a year—not merely unlikely—so many open-ended agreements fall outside it. And Florida courts have generally declined to let the doctrine of promissory estoppel be used to enforce a promise that the statute of frauds requires to be in writing. In other words, a party who acted in reliance on an unwritten promise may still be left without a remedy. The safest course is to put important agreements into a clear, signed writing before anyone relies on them.</p>
<p>Because the statute of frauds turns on details—what counts as a sufficient writing, who the “party to be charged” is, and whether a narrow exception might apply—it is an area where careful drafting and experienced counsel pay for themselves. If you are entering into a real estate transaction, a guaranty, a long-term lease, or any significant business agreement in Florida, I would be glad to help you make sure it is documented in a way the courts will enforce.</p>

<span style="font-size: 12px;"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance on your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney.</span></i></span>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Understanding the 501(c)(8) Fraternal Beneficiary Society: A Guide for Florida Nonprofits]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/understanding-the-501c8-fraternal-beneficiary-society-a-guide-for-florida-nonprofits/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47944</id>
            <updated>2026-06-16T05:25:28Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-16T05:13:14Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[When people think of tax-exempt organizations, the 501(c)(3) charity usually comes to mind first. But Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code recognizes more than two dozen categories of exempt organizations, and one of the oldest is the fraternal beneficiary society described in Section 501(c)(8). These organizations pair fellowship with mutual aid: members come together around a common bond, and…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/understanding-the-501c8-fraternal-beneficiary-society-a-guide-for-florida-nonprofits/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: 400;">When people think of tax-exempt organizations, the 501(c)(3) charity usually comes to mind first. But Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code recognizes more than two dozen categories of exempt organizations, and one of the oldest is the fraternal beneficiary society described in Section 501(c)(8). These organizations pair fellowship with mutual aid: members come together around a common bond, and the organization provides for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to those members and their dependents. The principal advantage is exemption from federal income tax on the organization’s exempt-function activities, which allows a fraternal society to devote more of its resources to serving its members and advancing the shared purpose that brought them together.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Qualifying under 501(c)(8) requires meeting several specific conditions. First, the organization must have a genuine fraternal purpose—membership based on a common tie or the pursuit of a common object—and carry on a substantial program of fraternal activities. Second, it must operate under the “lodge system,” which requires at least two active parts: a parent organization and one or more subordinate lodges, or branches, that the parent charters and that remain largely self-governing. Third, the organization must provide for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to its members or their dependents. Those benefits do not have to reach every member; a society can still qualify so long as most members are eligible and any criteria for excluding others are reasonable.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">It is worth distinguishing 501(c)(8) from its close relative, Section 501(c)(10). A 501(c)(10) domestic fraternal society also operates under the lodge system, but it does not pay life, sick, or accident benefits to members and instead devotes its net earnings to religious, charitable, and similar purposes. Choosing the right designation at the outset matters, because it shapes how the organization is structured and operated from day one. And exemption is not a one-time event: maintaining it means continuing to operate consistently with the fraternal purpose and the lodge structure, filing the required annual returns in the Form 990 series, and steering clear of activities that could place the exempt status at risk.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Because these requirements are technical and the consequences of a misstep can be significant, forming and maintaining a 501(c)(8) is an area where experienced counsel adds real value—from confirming the right exemption category and preparing the application for IRS recognition, to keeping the organization in compliance year after year. If you are considering establishing a fraternal beneficiary society in Florida, or want to make sure an existing one remains in good standing, I would welcome the opportunity to talk it through with you.</span>

<span style="font-size: 12px;"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance on your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney.</span></i></span>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Haft Law Group</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[When should nonprofits file for tax-exempt status?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/when-should-nonprofits-file-for-tax-exempt-status/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47936</id>
            <updated>2026-06-04T11:51:09Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-08T15:38:16Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[For Florida nonprofits, tax-exempt status is more than a label. It opens doors to grant funding and provides tax benefits. Knowing the filing window can help your organization get started on the right foot. What is the 27-month rule? The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gives nonprofit organizations a strict 27-month window from their official formation date to file for tax-exempt…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/when-should-nonprofits-file-for-tax-exempt-status/"><![CDATA[For Florida nonprofits, tax-exempt status is more than a label. It opens doors to grant funding and provides tax benefits. Knowing the filing window can help your organization get started on the right foot.
<h2>What is the 27-month rule?</h2>
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gives nonprofit organizations a strict 27-month window from their official formation date to file for tax-exempt status. <a href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/nonprofit-organizations-and-obtaining-tax-exempt-status/" data-wpel-link="internal">Filing within this period</a> offers tax-exempt status to apply retroactively to the incorporation date. This means the organization will not owe taxes on donations during that period. If you file after the 27-month window, the exemption usually starts from the date you submit the application.

However, if your group is late, you can ask the IRS for special forgiveness by proving you acted in good faith and simply had a fair reason for the delay. If approved, the IRS can still grant you tax-free status stretching back to your start date.
<h2>What happens if you don’t have tax-exempt status?</h2>
If an organization does not have tax-exempt status, donors cannot deduct their donations on their taxes. This often discourages other people from giving. Nonprofits may also have trouble opening bank accounts or working with vendors that need proof of tax-exempt status. Filing within the 27-month period can help avoid these problems and give partners confidence in the organization.
<h2>What should organizations consider before filing?</h2>
Before applying for tax-exempt status, a nonprofit should have several things ready. These include:
<ul>
 	<li aria-level="1">Articles of Incorporation filed with the Florida Department of State that include charitable purpose language the IRS looks for</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">Bylaws explaining how the organization will be run</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">An Employer Identification Number (EIN) from the IRS</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">A mission statement and planned activities that meet IRS charitable requirements</li>
 	<li aria-level="1">Financial records and a realistic budget showing the organization is prepared to handle money responsibly</li>
</ul>
Having these documents ready shows the organization has completed the needed administrative steps. Additionally, you must remember state-level rules. Before nonprofits can ask for a single dollar in donations within Florida, they must apply separately to the Florida Department of Revenue for local <a href="https://floridarevenue.com/taxes/businesses/Pages/nonprofit.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">state sales tax exemptions</a>.
<h2>Taking the next step</h2>
Federal and Florida state rules for tax-exempt status involve multiple layers of compliance. In such cases, you may benefit from working with a legal professional who can help clarify these requirements.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Scott  Haft</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Understanding the 501(c)(4) Social Welfare Organization: A Guide for Florida Nonprofits]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/understanding-the-501c4-social-welfare-organization-a-guide-for-florida-nonprofits/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47938</id>
            <updated>2026-06-02T15:59:57Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-02T15:59:57Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Most people equate “tax-exempt” with the 501(c)(3) charity. But Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code recognizes more than two dozen distinct categories of exempt organizations, each with its own purpose and rules. In earlier posts, we examined the 501(c)(3) charitable organization and the 501(c)(6) business league. This article turns to the category that ranks just behind them in sheer…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/06/understanding-the-501c4-social-welfare-organization-a-guide-for-florida-nonprofits/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: 400;">Most people equate “tax-exempt” with the 501(c)(3) charity. But Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code recognizes more than two dozen distinct categories of exempt organizations, each with its own purpose and rules. In earlier posts, we examined the 501(c)(3) charitable organization and the 501(c)(6) business league. This article turns to the category that ranks just behind them in sheer numbers: the 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. According to the IRS’s most recent Data Book, more than 71,000 organizations operate under Section 501(c)(4), making it one of the most widely used exemptions in the country.</span>
<h2><b>What Is a 501(c)(4) Organization?</b></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">To qualify under Section 501(c)(4), an organization must not be organized for profit and must be operated exclusively to promote social welfare. The IRS reads that to mean the organization must operate primarily to further the common good and general welfare of a community — bringing about civic betterment and social improvements. Classic examples include civic leagues, neighborhood and community associations, volunteer fire departments, and advocacy groups organized around a cause or issue. As with a 501(c)(3), none of the organization’s earnings may be used for the private benefit of an individual or insider.</span>
<h2><b>How It Differs From a 501(c)(3)</b></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Two distinctions set the social welfare organization apart from its better-known cousin. First, contributions to a 501(c)(4) are </span><b>generally not deductible</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> as charitable donations. Supporters give because they believe in the mission, not for a tax write-off — an important point to communicate when fundraising. Second, a 501(c)(4) enjoys far greater latitude to lobby. It may engage in </span><b>unlimited lobbying</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> germane to its purpose, even as its primary activity, without endangering its exempt status, whereas a 501(c)(3) may lobby only to an insubstantial degree. That flexibility is the principal reason many issue-advocacy organizations choose this structure. A social welfare organization may also engage in a limited amount of political campaign activity, so long as that is not its primary activity, though such spending can trigger tax under Section 527(f).</span>
<h2><b>Compliance Obligations</b></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Operating a 501(c)(4) involves more than simply declaring the status. Within 60 days of formation, the organization generally must file Form 8976 to notify the IRS of its intent to operate under Section 501(c)(4). IRS recognition is not strictly required, but many organizations also file Form 1024-A to obtain a determination letter and the certainty it provides. Ongoing responsibilities include annual Form 990-series filings, notifying members of the portion of dues spent on lobbying (or paying a “proxy tax” instead), and respecting the line between permissible social welfare work and disqualifying private benefit or commercial activity. Florida’s many homeowner groups, civic associations, and advocacy organizations regularly confront these questions as they form and grow.</span>
<h2><b>How Haft Law Group Can Help</b></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Because tax-exempt status is governed by federal law, the core 501(c)(4) requirements apply the same way nationwide. Choosing the right subsection at the outset — and documenting it correctly — can spare an organization years of avoidable trouble. At Haft Law Group, we help organizations in Florida, Washington, D.C., and Colorado — the jurisdictions where attorney Scott Haft is admitted to practice — determine whether a 501(c)(4), a 501(c)(3), or another structure best fits their mission, prepare the governing documents, file the necessary IRS notices and applications, and put in place the practices that keep an exemption secure. Whether you are launching a new civic organization or reassessing an existing one, we can guide you through every step. To discuss your organization’s goals, <a href="/contact/" data-wpel-link="internal">contact</a> Haft Law Group at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-CT-NUMBER-1"] or through our website.</span>

<i><span style="font-weight: 400;">This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Tax-exempt status is governed by complex, fact-specific rules; please consult a qualified attorney about your particular circumstances.</span></i>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Scott  Haft</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[The Strategic Advantages of 501(c)(6) Tax-Exempt Status for Trade and Professional Associations]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/05/the-strategic-advantages-of-501c6-tax-exempt-status-for-trade-and-professional-associations/" />
            <id>https://www.haftlawgroup.com/?p=47937</id>
            <updated>2026-06-02T16:05:48Z</updated>
            <published>2026-05-27T05:27:21Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[When business owners think about nonprofit tax exemption, the 501(c)(3) charitable designation often comes to mind first. However, organizations formed to promote the shared business interests of their members—such as trade associations, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, professional societies, and industry coalitions—may find that 501(c)(6) status offers a far better fit. Recognized under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.haftlawgroup.com/blog/2026/05/the-strategic-advantages-of-501c6-tax-exempt-status-for-trade-and-professional-associations/"><![CDATA[When business owners think about nonprofit tax exemption, the 501(c)(3) charitable designation often comes to mind first. However, organizations formed to promote the shared business interests of their members—such as trade associations, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, professional societies, and industry coalitions—may find that 501(c)(6) status offers a far better fit. Recognized under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, these "business leagues" exist not to benefit the public at large in a charitable sense, but to advance the common economic interests of an industry, profession, or geographic business community.

The most immediate benefit of 501(c)(6) status is federal income tax exemption on revenue related to the organization's exempt purpose. Membership dues, sponsorships, and qualifying program revenue can flow into the organization without being eroded by corporate income tax, allowing more resources to be reinvested into member services, industry research, educational programs, and certification initiatives. While contributions to a 501(c)(6) are not deductible as charitable gifts the way donations to a 501(c)(3) are, members can typically deduct their dues as ordinary and necessary business expenses—often a more relevant tax advantage for the businesses these organizations actually serve.

Perhaps the most significant strategic advantage of 501(c)(6) status is the freedom to advocate. Unlike 501(c)(3) charities, which face strict limits on lobbying and are prohibited from political campaign activity, a 501(c)(6) organization may engage in unlimited lobbying directly tied to its members' common business interests. This makes the 501(c)(6) structure an effective vehicle for industries that need to influence legislation, regulation, and public policy. Add to this the ability to set professional standards, offer member education, build credibility through a unified industry voice, and pool resources for group purchasing or insurance programs, and it becomes clear why so many influential trade associations operate under this designation.

That said, qualifying for and maintaining 501(c)(6) status requires careful structuring. The organization must serve an entire line of business or profession—not the private interests of a select few—and its activities must remain focused on the common good of the membership rather than performing particular services for individual members. Haft Law Group regularly advises emerging trade associations, professional societies, and industry groups on entity formation, IRS application strategy, governance structures, and ongoing compliance. If you are exploring whether a 501(c)(6) is the right vehicle for your organization, <a href="/contact/" data-wpel-link="internal">contact Haft Law Group</a> to discuss how to structure it for long-term success.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>